Matthew Harrison Brandy Essay

I am delighted to write to you this letter. I believe you are fine and ready to join me in celebrating the success of Matthew Harrison Brandy. Harrison with no doubt deserves kudos for this success. According to Genesis 1:1-3, God himself was and everything that became originated from Him. Thus God gives ability to all beings to be what He wants. Matthew argues that God did not give man mind to abandon his faith as Darwin did. Evidently in Genesis 3, Adam and Eve disobeyed God. In verses 5, the serpent lied to Adam that if they knew the truth, they would discover between good and evil (Milligan W. R, 1999). The individual mind of human should not be used as a tool to abandon the faith. Matthew gives an example of a sponge. He says, â€Å"Biblically a sponge would think if God allowed it to†. Yet still it ill not abandon its position unless it is displaced. This implies that all creatures made by God have the same privilege; they only differ on their purposes. Although Drummond uses Darwin’s theory of evaluation, it is clear that he does not cite the origin of creatures. His argument is biased since Darwin himself was a Christian believer became an atheist. This indicates that Darwin abandoned his orthodox Christian belief. It is true that revelations are given by God, and all living beings were created by the word of God as Brandy says in his argument. The created things multiplied there after as God commanded them. The argument of design cites back on a supreme intelligent being-God. He designed everything and they were good unto him (Milligan W. R, 1999). God had power to order creation of all things like water, heaven earth and other things. His intellect cannot be challenged. It is a great crime to make people believe in the law of evolution. sIt has flaws and confusions Darwin admit his guilt when he says that he lost direction after he abandoned his Christian faith. Fascinating observations from his thought became misleading. Darwin failed to give credit to God for creating all things. Matthew illustrates that man needed to have control in the garden Eden. In Darwinism he admits that man could not be trusted to make grand decisions. This implies he needed control which contradicts the theory of evolution. He further contradicts himself in explaining the origin of species. The wonderful universe could not be a result of blind chance. This is quite erroneous. Besides, how can man be a descendant of an ape? Man’s mind by no-means has no relation to a monkeys mind. After Adam and Eve had sinned, God gave them punishment. The same plague befell Darwin after he deviated from his orthodox faith. He therefore lost the voice of his conscience and reasoning. His spiritual and emotional aspects became weak. This made him have baseless philosophies. By having Henry support evolution, it is like he is insane. Only birds of the same feathers flock together. Matthew has no struggle to win the trial. In court, Henry looks sleepy and at one point he was told to wake up. Scientist offer sacrifice to their gods and this reveals a great deal of confusion and self destruction of life. Henry needs to believe in the supreme God. I am indeed happy that people will change and stand up to defend their belief that God is the creator of all things. Unthinkable conformity and censorship should be avoided for as a man thinks, so he is. Work cited Milligan W. R. The holy bible: new and old testaments. London: king James, 1999.